Introduction to CMMI - Course Feedback |
What I liked most from
SITARA's instruction ... |
|
NAME |
ADITYA
GOEL |
ORGANIZATION |
SATYAM |
Feedback |
- Approach in the presentation
flow and time management
|
|
NAME |
AKSHYANSU
MOHAPATRA |
ORGANIZATION |
vMOKSHA |
Feedback |
- Instructor's level and depth of
understanding on the new model which was transferred to us is very
highly appreciated
|
|
NAME |
ALOK MAHESHWARI |
ORGANIZATION |
ACS |
Feedback |
- All the PAs that the course
covered
- Implementation methodology and
presentation by the instructor
- CMMI serves as a guideline to
improve processes in the workplace
|
|
NAME |
ALVIN ONG |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA MALAYSIA |
Feedback |
- Very interactive course and the
instructor offered good examples
- Easily approachable instructor
who was helpful
|
|
NAME |
AMBARNATH CHATTOPADHYAY |
ORGANIZATION |
CYBERQ CONSULTING |
Feedback |
- Openness and warmth of the
training environment
- Precise, relevant discussions
- Clarity of concepts of the
faculty
- The class schedule - its pace
and distribution
- The administrative arrangements
- Idea and clarity on CMMI and the
confidence to implement it in organizations
|
|
NAME |
ANU KHENDRY |
ORGANIZATION |
SATYAM |
Feedback |
- Examples offered and
instructor's understanding of some model aspects
|
|
|
NAME |
DR. ANIRBAN BASU |
ORGANIZATION |
Q+ |
Feedback |
- Very good introduction to CMMI;
discussions were illuminating
- Instructor went all out to cover
other questions which were outside the scope of the course
|
|
NAME |
ASANO KAZUO |
ORGANIZATION |
JAPAN
RESEARCH INSTITUTE |
Feedback |
- The instructor was good and I
got a good understanding on CMMI which I need to build on
|
|
NAME |
ASOKAN S |
ORGANIZATION |
SSI
TECHNOLOGIES |
Feedback |
- Excellent course material
- Scope of the course (staged and
continuous concepts)
- Excellent way of handling the
course
|
|
|
NAME |
ASHISH ARVIND
PATHAK |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- Instructor's level of experience
and expertise; highly interactive session
|
|
NAME |
ASHOK KUMAR R |
ORGANIZATION |
L&T |
Feedback |
- The non-software examples given
to us
- The way the whole matter was
conveyed
|
|
|
NAME |
ANANDMOY
MITRA |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- Well presented with modular
architecture
- Touching upon knowledge which
were outside the scope of this particular course
- Clarification with a lot of good
examples
- Friendly and jovial instructor
(Raghav)
|
|
|
NAME |
APARNA RAGHAVAN |
ORGANIZATION |
INTEL |
Feedback |
- The communication skills of the
instructor was excellent; Raghav was able to get across the right
message in the right manner
- The course material and
presentation was excellent
|
|
NAME |
ATSUSHI
TAKADA |
ORGANIZATION |
MITSUE |
Feedback |
- Course contents, lecture,
material, speed and pace of learning
- Translations and performance of
translation was effective
- One thing I have come to
appreciate from this course was the - instructor!
|
|
NAME |
BALASUBRAMANIAN S. TIRUVENGADAM |
ORGANIZATION |
INTELLIGROUP |
Feedback |
- I liked the course PPT and
responses to queries from the instructor
|
|
NAME |
BENIKA AOKI |
ORGANIZATION |
ASIA PACIFIC SYSTEM RESEARCH CO. LTD. |
Feedback |
- Each phase had an exercise and
this enhanced our understanding and knowledge while our memory was
fresh.
|
|
NAME |
BHARGAVI ACHARYA |
ORGANIZATION |
SATYAM |
Feedback |
- Pace of the course
- Faculty's (Raghav) Communication
Skills and conceptual clarity in CMMI process elements
|
|
|
NAME |
Dr. BHASKAR
HARITA |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
|
Feedback |
- Presentation style including the
anecdotes
- Good overview of the topic
- Presenter's listening skills and
gentle facilitation
|
|
NAME |
BIPIN
KUMARJHA |
ORGANIZATION |
ACS
|
Feedback |
- Presentation, content, duration,
course material and communication
- I have come to appreciate the
value of having or following a process
|
|
NAME |
CH MURTHY |
ORGANIZATION |
SATYAM |
Feedback |
- Interpretation of the CMMI Model
and PAs with a business dimension (to a business context)
- Excellent package of courseware
and presentation
|
|
|
NAME |
CHANNAVEER
PATIL |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
|
Feedback |
|
|
|
NAME |
CHENTIL KUMAR |
ORGANIZATION |
SSI
TECHNOLOGIES |
Feedback |
- The examples quoted and the
approach used by the instructor
|
|
|
NAME |
DINESH SHARMA |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- Reinforced the resolve to take
the CMMI route for implementation in our organization
- Got a broad perspective to CMMI
|
|
NAME |
DIPANKAR SEN |
ORGANIZATION |
SATYAM |
Feedback |
- Presentation Material
- Faculty's presentation skills,
conceptual clarity and confidence
|
|
|
NAME |
DURGA PRASAD,
A |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- The depth of content of course
and the professional yet informal interactions and environment
created are best remembered
- It sets a pace for an
organization going for an assessment
- Understood the need for an
optimizing quantitatively managed process environment with
involvement of teams
|
|
NAME |
EDWIN NG |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
MALAYSIA |
Feedback |
- Fine articulation of course
material!
- Reference materials are easy to
read
- Ample time devoted to
discussions and analysis
- Punctuality, discipline and
adherence to the do's and dont's were observed
|
|
NAME |
NOR EZAM
SELAN |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
MALAYSIA |
Feedback |
- Instructor's vast knowledge
- Practical examples and easy to
relate non software examples
- Learning environment created by
the instructor
|
|
|
NAME |
GABY LIN |
ORGANIZATION |
ACS |
Feedback |
- Knowledge of the instructor; the
instructor was wonderful
- The course discussions and
participation
|
|
NAME |
GANESH KUMAR M.C. |
ORGANIZATION |
VISTEON
|
Feedback |
- Infrastructure of the training
room
- Good dissemination of knowledge
on continuous and staged representation
- Good rapport among participants
- Good information sharing
- Obtaining participant wish list
|
|
NAME |
GANESH
SANKARARAMAN |
ORGANIZATION |
VMOKSHA
|
Feedback |
- Instructor's presentation and
interaction with the team
|
|
|
NAME |
GEETHA
PARTHASARATHY |
ORGANIZATION |
QUALITY POINT
|
Feedback |
- The course delivery by the
instructor was excellent
- Clarity in expressions while
maintaining a very interactive atmosphere
|
|
|
NAME |
GEETHA. P |
ORGANIZATION |
SSI
TECHNOLOGIES |
Feedback |
- Exercises were apt
- Correlating and providing
comparisons between Software CMM, CMMI V1.02 and CMMI V1.1
- Instructor clarified concepts
and doubts very clearly
|
|
NAME |
GIRISH DIXIT |
ORGANIZATION |
ACS |
Feedback |
- Course material, course content
and instructor's ability
|
|
|
NAME |
GURURAJ
MANAGULI |
ORGANIZATION |
QAI INDIA
LTD. |
Feedback |
- Interactions; easy to remember
hints and facilitation of the instructor (Raghav)
|
|
NAME |
V. HARIKRISHNAN |
ORGANIZATION |
SATYAM |
Feedback |
- Interaction and course material
|
|
NAME |
HARIHARAN, M |
ORGANIZATION |
SSI
TECHNOLOGIES |
Feedback |
- Subject knowledge of the faculty
- Communication skills of the
faculty
- Highly interactive session
allowing every individual to freely express their opinion
- I was truly able to admire the
CMMI Model
|
|
NAME |
HARSHIT
THAKER |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- Content of the course, exercise
and knowledge of the presenter
- Thorough understanding of the
CMMI model
|
|
NAME |
HIDEAKI
KATORI |
ORGANIZATION |
MITSUBISHI |
Feedback |
- Enhanced and detailed
understanding of the staged and continuous representations
- Enhanced understanding on
relationships among PAs and linkage of related PAs
- Exercises and discussions were
very valuable
- Items that should be implemented
were systematically organized and elaborated by the instructor
|
|
NAME |
HITESH A.
SANGHAVI |
ORGANIZATION |
CUNIX |
Feedback |
- High level of instructor's
passion and energy
- Presentation style
- Overall learning and
facilitation; a very catalytic (program) for enabling consultants
|
|
NAME |
HIROHARU YOSHIKAWA |
ORGANIZATION |
RICOH, JAPAN |
Feedback |
- Proceedings in general and
examples that were provided made it easy to understand the CMMI
- Exercise settings (perspective,
methodology and timing)
|
|
NAME |
HIROYASU YAMAKAWA |
ORGANIZATION |
RICOH, JAPAN |
Feedback |
- Various examples given were
clear and very good
- Instructor spent enough time in
answering our questions until we were convinced about it!
|
|
NAME |
HIROYUKI ONO |
ORGANIZATION |
MITSUE |
Feedback |
- Nice demeanor of the instructor
in his manner of speech, time allocation and presentation style
- I understood the importance of
statistical techniques in analyzing and collecting data at level 4
and 5
- I wanted to have details of each
process area from a business management perspective; finally I have
got a good understanding of the overall picture!
|
|
|
NAME |
HEMANT MITAL |
ORGANIZATION |
VMOKSHA
|
Feedback |
- Clarity of the subject matter of
the instructor (Raghav)
|
|
NAME |
HIROCHI
TANI |
ORGANIZATION |
CANON SOFT |
Feedback |
- Explanation of continuous
representation and staged representation using SITARA's onion
paradigm
- Using OHP to explain additional
topics on software engineering and management
- Explanations offered to
understand the concepts of Generic Goals and Capability levels with
overall understanding of the CMMI framework
|
|
|
NAME |
JAYANT
DESHPANDE |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- It was very interactive and I
enjoyed the 3 days of learning
- The course helped me understand
the concepts very well and the direct relevance of the process
improvement initiative for any organization
|
|
|
NAME |
JOHN OOI |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
MALAYSIA |
Feedback |
- Use of analogies to relate 'real
world' examples to CMMI
- Open and highly interactive
session
- Instructor's clear, concise and
'interesting' choice of words
|
|
NAME |
JOYDEEP
CHAKRABARTY |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- Its significance and possibility
of implementation in our organization
- It was very interactive and with
lots of examples
- Its detailed approach keeping in
view all aspects of an organization's process and structure
|
|
NAME |
JUNICHI ITOH |
ORGANIZATION |
RICOH, JAPAN |
Feedback |
- The process area diagrams
- EPPAT MIMOR EC!
- To keep interpretation tight
enough but loose enough on appraisals
- CMMI is a management tool
|
|
|
NAME |
KAZUHIRO SOGA |
ORGANIZATION |
CANON SOFT |
Feedback |
- Visually understood the
difference between maturity level and capability level
- Quality of responses given by
the instructor were great and very rich
- Casual learning atmosphere was
created by the instructor in the class
- Comfortable to ask any question
in the class and instructor not only answered the questions well but
also expanded upon the response to share more knowledge
- SITARA's onion paradigm of
adding layers of process capability on a core was very insightful
|
|
|
NAME |
KAZUHIKO WAKABAYASHI |
ORGANIZATION |
JAPAN
RESEARCH INSTITUTE |
Feedback |
- Highlights of the CMMI and
emphasis on critical points by the instructor
- Exercises were carried out in a
way that accounts for language barriers in a good manner
- Explanations of the right
thinking about the implementation of CMMI was very helpful
|
|
NAME |
T.
KATHAVARAYAN |
ORGANIZATION |
SIEMENS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS LTD. |
Feedback |
- The full session was
lively with participation from all participants; good logistics
arrangements
|
|
|
NAME |
KARTHIK
PADMANABHAN |
ORGANIZATION |
SSI
TECHNOLOGIES |
Feedback |
- Knowledge and experience of Mr.
Raghav Nandyal was excellently transferred to the participants
through lucid explanations and real-life examples
- Openness to queries and answers
clarified doubts is much appreciated
- The course is very well
structured and administered taking into account participant's needs,
maturity of the organization
- All expectations were met and
surpassed!
|
|
NAME |
KEN
HASHIMOTO |
ORGANIZATION |
JAPAN
RESEARCH INSTITUTE |
Feedback |
- Related but non-CMMI topics were
very well explained for better clarity on CMMI
- SITARA's onion paradigm was very
intuitive and easy to understand
|
|
NAME |
KENICHI
KINODA |
ORGANIZATION |
CANON SOFT |
Feedback |
- The use of OHP sheets by the
instructor to convey additional insights were a great supplement to
our understanding
- I liked the examples of CMMI
implementations offered by the instructor
|
|
|
NAME |
KIRTHI
VALLIOOR |
ORGANIZATION |
INTELLIGROUP |
Feedback |
- What I liked were: The
non-software scenarios and examples
- The 'NOT-PUTTING-ME-TO-SLEEP'
approach by keeping the sessions lively and interesting with
exercises
- The systematic and methodical
approach taken by Raghav along with imparting the heavy process
stuff at a steady pace without getting us overwhelmed!
|
|
NAME |
KRISHNA, S.P. |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- The course content, flow and
presentation
- Interactive and intuitive
sessions
- A good group composition of two
organizations (one with CMM processes in place and another totally
new to the area)
|
|
NAME |
KRISHNA M
PRADHAN |
ORGANIZATION |
INTELLIGROUP |
Feedback |
- Organized approach
- Detailed course flow with good
examples
- Relating CMMI to practical
problems and solutions
- Time and Quality of approach ...
I have come to appreciate the expert provided to guide us!
|
|
NAME |
KYOICHI
KUWANO |
ORGANIZATION |
RICOH, JAPAN |
Feedback |
- Non-software example provided
made it easy to understand CMMI
- I appreciate the importance of
Project Planning and Measurement & Analysis most after the course
|
|
NAME |
S. LAXMAN |
ORGANIZATION |
SATYAM |
Feedback |
- The good amount of interaction
between the faculty and the participants
- Ability to relate to examples
quoted
|
|
|
NAME |
MADHUSUDHANA
RAO, S |
ORGANIZATION |
SSI
TECHNOLOGIES |
Feedback |
- Crisp and clear introduction
with good interactive session
|
|
NAME |
MAHENDRA
JOSHI |
ORGANIZATION |
L & T |
Feedback |
- Presentation methodology-you
made a complicated book very simple to understand!
|
|
|
NAME |
MANOJ KUMAR
MITTAL |
ORGANIZATION |
VMOKSHA |
Feedback |
- Well organized presentation with
good interaction
|
|
|
NAME |
MANOJ UPPAL |
ORGANIZATION |
ZENSAR |
Feedback |
- Faculty's in-depth knowledge of
the whole subject, right from fundamentals to practical approaches
to issues enlightened me to a great extent
|
|
|
NAME |
MATHI EZHIL
ARASU |
ORGANIZATION |
SSI
TECHNOLOGIES |
Feedback |
- Raghav's friendliness
- Creating a highly informal and
effective learning environment
- Very appropriate and easy to
understand examples and industry specific experiences
- Overall a very good session that
helped me to learn and relate concepts to work area and network with
other participants
|
|
|
NAME |
MITAKE YOSHIDA |
ORGANIZATION |
MITSUBISHI |
Feedback |
- The explanations of concepts of
CMMI at different maturity levels
- Responses to questions offered
by the instructor
- I got a good understanding of
the CMMI concepts
|
|
NAME |
MITSUGU KOMINAMI |
ORGANIZATION |
MITSUBISHI |
Feedback |
- A lot of non-software examples
to illustrate ideas made it easy to understand
- Explanations on the relationship
among PAs was useful
|
|
NAME |
MITSUO KOJIMA |
ORGANIZATION |
CANON SOFT |
Feedback |
- The way the instructor interacts
with delegates was excellent
- Course materials, sharing of
additional need-to-know information about process improvement using
OHP by the instructor was excellent
- Break-out sessions for
clarifying concepts using Q&A was well designed and well organized
|
|
NAME |
P. MOHAMMED
SHAREEF |
ORGANIZATION |
SSI
TECHNOLOGIES |
Feedback |
- The presentation with right
examples
- Clarification and the ability to
involve every participant in the learning
- The tips and methods to remember
the model explaining details from other self generated Powerpoint
slides
- Readily available artifacts to
explain and offer clarifications
|
|
|
NAME |
MONISHITA
BATHIJA |
ORGANIZATION |
VMOKSHA |
Feedback |
- Well structured course and
course material
|
|
|
NAME |
MUKUL
|
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
INDIA |
Feedback |
- The initial introduction; i.e.,
first 2 hours (helped to set the context)
- Acronym to remember the 10
generic practices
- Instructor gave enough time and
attention to participants whenever there were doubts/questions
|
|
|
NAME |
MUKUND TORO |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
INDIA |
Feedback |
- Very instructive course with
good coverage of all details
|
|
|
NAME |
NARASIMHAN S |
ORGANIZATION |
INTEL |
Feedback |
- Interaction with audience
- Focused approach and good
answers to questions
|
|
NAME |
NAGARAJ N |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- Distinctions between capability
level, maturity level and generic/specific goals and practices
- Overall understanding of the
CMMI model concepts
|
|
|
NAME |
NARENDRA V.
KARAMBELKAR |
ORGANIZATION |
INDEPENDENT |
Feedback |
- Instructor's in-depth knowledge
- Course simplicity and duration
(3 days) was just enough and right
|
|
|
NAME |
A. NATRAJ |
ORGANIZATION |
SSI
TECHNOLOGIES |
Feedback |
|
|
|
NAME |
NAOKO
KIYOTO |
ORGANIZATION |
SATYAM |
Feedback |
- Instructor was very capable and
excellent
- Exercise was very useful
|
|
NAME |
NAVIN KOTIAN |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- Thorough and comprehensive
explanation of the model. Amazing!
- Great instructor and the way of
presenting the methodology
- Good discussions among the group
helped clarify a lot of points
|
|
|
NAME |
NEELIMA YADAV |
ORGANIZATION |
SIEMENS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS LTD. |
Feedback |
- Instructor's (Raghav) knowledge
of the subject
- Instructor's ability to convey
his ideas and
- Instructor's ability to answer
questions
|
|
NAME |
NG KWANG MING |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
MALAYSIA |
Feedback |
- Instructor's (Raghav) rapport
- Timing of breaks and the
non-software examples (systems examples)
- Illustration of ideas from
People CMM and how it fits my organization
|
|
|
NAME |
R.
PARTHASARATHY |
ORGANIZATION |
QUALITY POINT |
Feedback |
- Excellent presentation
- Kept the class engaged
throughout
- High degree of clarity of
thoughts
|
|
|
NAME |
PRABHAKAR R |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
INDIA |
Feedback |
- Very interactive and lively
sessions
- Practitioner's approach
|
|
|
NAME |
PRABHUU SINHA |
ORGANIZATION |
SATYAM |
Feedback |
- In depth understanding and
comparison with other models (SW-CMM, People CMM etc.)
- Benefits of continuous versus
staged
|
|
NAME |
PRADEEP
ENGINEER |
ORGANIZATION |
INTELLIGROUP |
Feedback |
- The instructor, as always!
- The pace of the course - was
just right notwithstanding the large scope of coverage
- Funda of using mnemonics - EPPAT
MIMOR EC
- The exercises at the end of the
module
- What I have come to appreciate
from this course is that no matter how you try, you cannot think of
an alternative framework!
|
|
NAME |
PRAFUL INGLE |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
INDIA |
Feedback |
- Ability of the instructor to
handle queries
|
|
NAME |
PRASANTA K. PANIGRAHY |
ORGANIZATION |
L & T
|
Feedback |
- Delivery of presentation;
humorous examples to illustrate ideas in CMMI
|
|
NAME |
RABI NARAYAN
ROUT |
ORGANIZATION |
L & T |
Feedback |
- Method of presentation; friendly
attitude of instructor and a small group
|
|
|
NAME |
RAGOTHAMAN RAMACHANDRAN |
ORGANIZATION |
PHILIPS SOFTWARE |
Feedback |
- Reinforcement of concepts
through exercises
- Real life examples both software
and non-software examples
- Team activities (discussions
generated as a group brining different perspectives)
- Importance given to
interpretation of the model contextually
- Concept that measurements are
not required when they are not actually required
|
|
NAME |
RAGHU R. KAMATH |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- The non-IT examples that were
provided to reinforce concepts
- Usage of mnemonics to simplify
the CMMI model
- Ambience and training
environment
|
|
NAME |
Dr. RAJIB NAG |
ORGANIZATION |
CYBERQ |
Feedback |
- Raghav's passion for the subject
- Interactive discussions on
contentious topics
- The opportunity to interact with
other professionals
|
|
NAME |
RAJSHEKAR. M.B |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- Best training material
- Experience of the trainer
|
|
NAME |
RAKESH SINGH |
ORGANIZATION |
SATYAM |
Feedback |
- Interconnections of the PA: The
way it was explained
- EPPATMIMOR EC: You bet, this
made life simpler!
- Shooting 2 birds: Learnt both
the continuous and staged models
|
|
NAME |
RAMPRASAD T.S. |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
INDIA |
Feedback |
- CMMI introduction and
terminology explained in the course
- SCAMPI Information and
assessment experience of the instructor (Raghav Nandyal) as a lead
assessor
|
|
|
NAME |
K.R. RAMESH |
ORGANIZATION |
TUV |
Feedback |
- Style and confidence in
presentation of Raghav
- Language used was very polished
and professional
- Planning and preparation for the
course
- Handouts were adequate for the
course
|
|
|
NAME |
RAMASUBRAMANIAM, G. |
ORGANIZATION |
SSI
TECHNOLOGIES |
Feedback |
- Faculty was very interactive and
examples were pretty relevant to the course
|
|
|
NAME |
RANJEET YADAV |
ORGANIZATION |
SSI
TECHNOLOGIES |
Feedback |
- Extremely useful and great
course material
- Scope of the course with high
relevance to what we are doing
|
|
NAME |
RATNABOLI
KAR |
ORGANIZATION |
INTELLIGROUP |
Feedback |
- Neatness of the presentation
- Information was specific to our
organizational needs
- Knowledge of the instructor was
extraordinary which helped us understand the course easily
|
|
|
NAME |
Dr.
RAVICHANDRAN |
ORGANIZATION |
SSI
TECHNOLOGIES |
Feedback |
- Learning together
- Conceptual understanding of
requirements engineering
- Live examples and value addition
from learning about continuous model also
- Interaction and pace of
presentation
|
|
|
NAME |
RAVINDRA V.S. |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
INDIA |
Feedback |
- Easy paced; good moderation of
topics and coverage at the end of 3 days
|
|
|
NAME |
RICHARD
GEORGE |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS
|
Feedback |
- Understanding what was CMMI
- Mapping process areas to the
things we do now
|
|
|
NAME |
SACHDEV
NIRAGHATAM |
ORGANIZATION |
ACS |
Feedback |
- Presentation, course material,
clarity, confidence, knowledge and ability of the instructor to make
us understand
|
|
NAME |
SAFEER
IBRAHIMKUTTY |
ORGANIZATION |
PHILIPS
SOFTWARE |
Feedback |
- Basic concepts of CMMI, its
evolution and difference from CMM
- The group exercises in-between
modules; flow of presentation and time management
- Faculty's knowledge of the
subject and concepts
- Non-software examples used to
demonstrate ideas, thoughts and EPPAT MIMOR EC!!
- Good and thorough understanding
of basic fundamental concepts and wisdom of CMMI (The details we can
get, as we read through and implement the model in our organization)
|
|
NAME |
SANJAY R |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- Structure and simplicity of the
course; a good understanding of the CMMI model
|
|
NAME |
SANJAY
CHITNIS |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
INDIA |
Feedback |
- Overall good delivery with
excellent examples
|
|
|
NAME |
SANTHA KUMAR |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
INDIA |
Feedback |
- Breaks! Sufficient but then
still making it on time; GREAT TIME MANAGEMENT
- The discussions on different
topics
|
|
|
NAME |
SATHYANATH S.
BHAT |
ORGANIZATION |
VMOKSHA |
Feedback |
- Excellent real-life examples for
driving home points
- Excellent case-studies to
understand the concepts
- The instructor (Raghav) kept the
session lively and interesting throughout
|
|
NAME |
SATHYANARAYANA
MURTHY C |
ORGANIZATION |
ACS |
Feedback |
- Interactive session with real
world examples
- Practical exercises and highly
knowledgeable instructor
|
|
NAME |
SATHYANIRANJAN
T.K. |
ORGANIZATION |
ACS |
Feedback |
- The approach of the training
- The presentation was in
good pace with very high interaction
- Depth was not confusing but
handled appropriately
- Exercises were good and not
complex
|
|
NAME |
SANJEEV GUPTA |
ORGANIZATION |
ACS |
Feedback |
- Interactive sessions, excellent
coverage of the course material (time and content) with analogies to
relate with
|
|
|
NAME |
SATISH V.
CHAKRAD |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- The wish list was asked at the
beginning of the course from each participant and was ensured that
at the end of the course they were met.
- It was more of discussions and
learn together rather than a class room type learning
|
|
NAME |
SANTOSH
VADEYAR |
ORGANIZATION |
SATYAM |
Feedback |
- Interactions and group
discussions
|
|
NAME |
SHAILESH
GANGAKHEDKAR |
ORGANIZATION |
INTELLIGROUP
|
Feedback |
- The course instructor's way of
handling the course; it was great!
|
|
NAME |
SHEKAR
MAHALINGAM |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
INDIA
|
Feedback |
- The formalism of the CMMI model
and presentation of the unambiguous detail behind GGs, SGs, and SPs
- The balance between structured
and unstructured discussions, presentation of the material; the bag!
|
|
NAME |
SHOJI
DATE |
ORGANIZATION |
JAPAN
RESEARCH INSTITUTE |
Feedback |
- The speed and the content of the
course were just right
- I was able to obtain a
systematic understanding of the CMMI
|
|
|
NAME |
SRIDHAR
KALAGA, V. |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
INDIA |
Feedback |
- Simple way of remembering the
generic practices and explanation of how profiling of continuous
model is used and rendered
|
|
|
NAME |
SRINATH R
MALAYANGULAM |
ORGANIZATION |
INTELLIGROUP |
Feedback |
- Instructor's knowledge and
ability to handle and complete the course on schedule
|
|
NAME |
SRINIVAS
ANNAPPINDI |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- Total organization of the
training program
- Supporting non-software and
software examples and information given related to the course and
- Presentation style
|
|
NAME |
M. SRINIVAS
RAO |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- Clarity and depth of knowledge
of the instructor
- Interactive nature of the
workshop
- The model itself!
|
|
NAME |
SRIRAM
KRISHNAN |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- The presentation was very clear
- Approach was good, considering
the limited time that was available
- Explanation of CMMI concepts and
its inter-relationships was good
- The place/environment for the
workshop
|
|
NAME |
B.
SIVAGURUNATHAN |
ORGANIZATION |
INDEPENDENT |
Feedback |
- Clarity in expression
- Analysis of (CMMI) scenarios
from an implementer and practitioner perspectives
- Real time and lively examples
and interactions
- Shared learning experiences
|
|
NAME |
M. SIVALINGAM |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
MALAYSIA |
Feedback |
- Material was well organized and
presented with good reference material
|
|
NAME |
SOMSHEKHAR UMADI |
ORGANIZATION |
L & T |
Feedback |
- Ambience, limited audience, good
tutor and good presentation
|
|
|
NAME |
SUBRAMANYA
K.N |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
INDIA |
Feedback |
- The contents of the course and
the way the course was delivered
- Maturity and knowledge of the
participants
|
|
|
NAME |
SUBRAHMANYA G.M. |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- Got a very clear idea about
process improvement, goals and practices
- Structure of the course material
- Discussions and exercises
- Presentation skills of the
trainer
- Readymade and complete
information about CMMI
|
|
NAME |
SUBRAMANIAN |
ORGANIZATION |
ABB |
Feedback |
- Well developed course and
presentation
- Participative nature of the
program
|
|
NAME |
S.
SUBRAMANIAN |
ORGANIZATION |
SSI
TECHNOLOGIES |
Feedback |
- Sessions were interactive with
good examples which were practical and could be correlated easily
- Good understanding of the CMMI
concepts
|
|
|
NAME |
SUDARSAN
THYAGARAJAN |
ORGANIZATION |
INTELLIGROUP |
Feedback |
- Course delivery, contents of the
course and explanation of concepts with non-software examples was
much liked
|
|
NAME |
SUNIL
NAIR |
ORGANIZATION |
INTELLIGROUP |
Feedback |
- The non-software examples
provided helped in relating to the process areas
- The clarity of presentation has
enabled me to have the necessary knowledge about the framework to
look for smarter options
|
|
NAME |
SURESHA
RAMACHANDRA |
ORGANIZATION |
ACS |
Feedback |
- The course content, course
narration, interactions, analogies and the course material
|
|
NAME |
SUNIL
SATYANATHAN |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- The course met objectives of an
individual not introduced to standard processes before
- It was an open learning
environment and having participants with better experiences lifted
me quickly in my learning
|
|
|
NAME |
R.K. SINGH |
ORGANIZATION |
SIEMENS
INFORMATION SYSTEMS LTD. |
Feedback |
- Flexibility in flow of the
course
- Open participants involvement
|
|
|
NAME |
SUBRATA
BANERJEE |
ORGANIZATION |
VMOKSHA |
Feedback |
- Interaction of the trainer with
the participants
- Subject knowledge of Raghav
|
|
NAME |
SUMEETA HARI |
ORGANIZATION |
SATYAM |
Feedback |
- Instructor's experiential
understanding of the model
- Examples - technical and
non-technical
|
|
|
NAME |
SUNIL GUPTA |
ORGANIZATION |
VMOKSHA |
Feedback |
- Pace of the course with
sufficient breaks
|
|
|
NAME |
SURAJ PRAKASH |
ORGANIZATION |
WIPRO |
Feedback |
- The passion of the instructor
- Thorough knowledge of CMMI and
interrelations of PAs.
|
|
NAME |
TAN POEK HUI |
ORGANIZATION |
ACS |
Feedback |
- The interactive discussions were
good; exercises were relevant
- Training material was very
detailed with the CMMI model descriptions being available for
download
- The instructor was very
knowledgeable and could relate the course content very well to real
life situations (both software and non software engineering)
- EPPAT MIMOR EC
|
|
NAME |
TANIGAWA JUNICHI |
ORGANIZATION |
JAPAN
RESEARCH INSTITUTE |
Feedback |
- Studied the latest information
about the CMMI
- Studied CMMI terminology in
original English language!
- Studied implementation ideas on
CMMI besides the CMMI text
- Translators were excellent
- Instructor was very capable and
excellent
|
|
NAME |
TOMOYUKI KANEDA |
ORGANIZATION |
ASIA PACIFIC
SYSTEM RESEARCH CO. LTD. |
Feedback |
- Instructor gave us detailed and
clear answers to our questions.
- I appreciated the fact that in
addition to conducting measurement and using actual data,
quantifying (setting targets) should also be done periodically.
|
|
NAME |
TETSUJI YAMASHITA |
ORGANIZATION |
MITSUE |
Feedback |
- Mnemonics to remember the CMMI
which were offered by the instructor from SITARA on EPPAT MIMOR EC
etc
- PA correlations were illustrated
very well
- Excellent interpretation
services used
|
|
NAME |
UTKARSH KUMAR
RAI |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
INDIA |
Feedback |
- Speed, content and instructor's
ability to relate the CMMI to day-to-day happenings
|
|
NAME |
VAJENDRA DESAI |
ORGANIZATION |
L & T |
Feedback |
- EPPATMIMOR (EC) memorization;
the course timing
- Nice introduction to CMMI Course
with examples shown such as (motor assembly picture, newspaper
clippings)
- Humorous way of clarifying
things
|
|
NAME |
VEENA
RAMAGOPALAN |
ORGANIZATION |
PHILIPS
SOFTWARE |
Feedback |
- The model as a whole
- The structuring of PAs for
engineering processes; elaborations listed out in the model with
examples
- The exercises carried out at the
end of every module
- Better understanding of
the model to help my organization in closing the gaps w.r.t CMMI
|
|
NAME |
VISHY
NARAYANA |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
MALAYSIA |
Feedback |
- Instructor was able to
articulate interpretation of the CMMI very well using rich and
effective communication skills
- Exercises were good;
clarifications of queries were very well handled
- A potentially 'boring' course
was made lively - thanks to Raghav!
- What else but ... EPPAT MIMOR,
EC and 1432 and 1542!
|
|
|
NAME |
Wng Cmdr. S.
VENKATESAM |
ORGANIZATION |
INDEPENDENT |
Feedback |
- Capability of the instructor to
handle a set of very senior functionaries
- Ability to interlace theory and
his own experience along with participants experiences
- Depth of knowledge
|
|
NAME |
WONG
WAI TONG |
ORGANIZATION |
MOTOROLA
MALAYSIA |
Feedback |
- Exercises, QnA and
implementation discussions were what I liked
|
|
|
NAME |
J. VIDHYA |
ORGANIZATION |
SAMSUNG |
Feedback |
- Excellent delivery of the
program
- Queries well answered
- Great participation of the team
|
|
NAME |
VIJAY K.
MALLAMPATI |
ORGANIZATION |
INTELLIGROUP |
Feedback |
- Mnemonics approach, exercises,
non-software examples cited, style of presentation without using
much of the CMMI big-book, but relating everything through the
presentations which covered the contents of the big-book, were most
liked.
|
|
|
NAME |
VINIT
MAHESHWARI |
ORGANIZATION |
CYBERQ
CONSULTING |
Feedback |
- Case studies/exercises, course
material, logistics, time management and participative style
|
|
NAME |
VINOD S.
SAVALGI |
ORGANIZATION |
NETWORK
SOLUTIONS |
Feedback |
- Better understanding of CMMI
- Group discussions and well
designed course material will help us to roll out the CMMI in NetSol
|
|
NAME |
VINOD SHARMA |
ORGANIZATION |
INTELLIGROUP |
Feedback |
- Instructor's depth of knowledge
and the way of handling Q'nA
|
|
NAME |
VISHWANATH M.
JOSHI |
ORGANIZATION |
ACS |
Feedback |
- Clarity of understanding
obtained
- Communication, confidence,
presentation skills and technical ability of the instructor
|
|
NAME |
VVNSS MURTHY |
ORGANIZATION |
INTELLIGROUP |
Feedback |
- The exercises provided
throughout the course
- Previous association with the
faculty
- The course material and examples
given (which were context based).
- The expertise and experience of
the faculty
|
|
NAME |
YASUSHI
WATANABE |
ORGANIZATION |
JAPAN
RESEARCH INSTITUTE |
Feedback |
- Explanations on the estimated
man hours and man days required for SCAMPI appraisal
- Easy-to-understand correlations
and mnemonics offered for Process Areas
|
|
NAME |
YOSHIKAZU
HARANO |
ORGANIZATION |
JAPAN
RESEARCH INSTITUTE |
Feedback |
- Plenty of explanation on
concepts were offered
- Elaborate answers were provided
to participants' questions
- Received detailed understanding
of CMMI up to Level 5
- It was useful that the lecture
was given by such a great expert of CMMI who has deep understanding
of the subject
|
|
|